Sunday, October 2, 2016

Experts Views on the Value of Business

Chuck Blakeman started seven businesses on four continents but he feels the traditional business plan is a waist of time.  Blakeman spoke about rehumanizing business by giving everyone their brain back; he has a no-nonsense approach to life and business.  He is the type to help you unlearned everything learned about business then rebuilds you up with great information.  He not only wants to transform your business but also your life.  Even though Blakeman has an unconventional way of thing I agree with him on a certain level. I do know some people will spend months almost years trying to perfect their business plan in retrospect if that time was applied directly to the business the business would be up and running by now.  However on the other hand, I do think an entrepreneur needs some sort of guide to follow. How successful can a person be if they just wing it all?

Carl Schramm is currently a professor at Syracuse University; he also serves as a visiting scientist at MIT and a member of the Council on Foreign Relations. (Thinkbrg.org, 2016).   Even though Carl Schramm is an educator is views on entrepreneur are not textbook.  He believes sticking to a traditional business plan is a waist of time because business plans quickly expires.  Everything does not need to be exact according to him, being exact is being redundant and being redundant is being normal.  Some characteristics of an entrepreneur according to Carl Schramm are: they think in terms of disruption, and are often thought to be disruptive by the change-averse: They see things differently, considering untraditional forces that others did not see.

It’s a little funny to me how I pick to men who think unconventional, like myself.  Yes, I believe everyone needs a foundation and guidance however textbooks often go out of date with information so why solely rely on textbooks for information and a blue print?




Reference:




http://www.syracuse.com/news/index.ssf/2014/09/carl_schramm_leadership.html

Sunday, January 10, 2016

TV Research

IS REALITY TV BAD???

The first said to be reality TV show was An American Family, it aired in 1973 on PBS. The camera’s followed the Loud family a family of 5 where the parents went through a divorce while Lance the oldest brother openly admitted he was gay on TV.  According to daily mail.com newspaper the loud family was the Kardashians of the 70s...attractive, wealthy, dysfunctional. Just as current reality stars have stated opening up your home to America is not always good. In 2001 Lance Loud died from HIV complications he received a lot of backlash from the media by being gay on TV in the 1970’s.  Reality TV also keeps the stereotypes alive by how Black women are portrayed in entertainment. Because black female roles are still limited on TV society would rather see women that look like them but not necessarily act like them. “It is not just the genre of reality TV that produces the fear of negative black imagery. Black female representation on television and in film is so scarce that any woman cast in these roles is believed to have the power to stunt the progress black women have made in society.”(Warner, 2015) So I ask the question should we be grateful we have this platform of reality TV even though it may hinder some?

THE YEAR OF BLACK WOMEN ON TV

Its no secret that today’s Top TV shows are played by black actresses, Scandal, How To Get Away with Murder and Empire. Before Kerry Washington made her scandal debut the last show that featured an African American woman in a network drama was in 1974 the Get Christie Love show. Shonda Rhimes the writer of Grey’s Anatomy, Scandal and How To Get Away with Murder thinks it’s about time Black actresses are getting noticed. When Shonda accepted her Director’s Guild award for diversity she said, “She’s ticked, she said, “because there still needs to be an award. Like, there’s such a lack of people hiring women and minorities that when someone does it on a regular basis, they are given an award.” (Wiltz, 2014) Is this just a money thing? There will be more Black women on TV because it makes sense, it’s a smart economic move so why not? African-American buying power is projected to reach $1.1 trillion next year, it makes smart business sense to populate television shows with all different types of people. But will these actresses get full recognition? Scandal is one of ABC’s hit moneymakers but Kerry Washington hasn’t been the winner of any award show because she plays a role where she carries on an affair with the “white” President of United States.  Even though I’m grateful society still has a lot of work to do accepting minorities and putting them on TV.


THE NEXT GENERATION

Even though I Love classic TV I will not make it as a successful Television Producer if I try to create the same shows. TV today is very competitive and I will have to bring something new and fresh to the table. Old school won’t work I have to tell stories that my generations and future generations can relate to Not the Cosby’s nor The Real Housewives of any place. Shonda Rhimes said it the best TV has to look like what we look like. “It’s who is telling the stories,” she says, “because the people telling the stories are the people deciding who you see onscreen, they’re the people who are deciding who are in the writers rooms, they’re the people deciding on the crew.” (Berman, 2015)
Independent TV has also made a huge impact on how people view TV not only can I turn on the TV but I can also use my computer to follow several web based programs, this is the new era and there are multiple ways to reach your audience today. “ITVFest has created a trusted doorway for indie artists to take the next steps in their career, based solely on the merit of their work and their professionalism,” (Meek, 2105)


WILL STREAMING TV KILL LIVE TV NETWORKS?
Television now works with it’s subscribers convenience my favorite shows I have to watch it Live the day it comes on the time it comes on but that’s not convenient for all. My daughter likes to stream her TV shows or record them so she can binge watch and I have a subscription to Netflix and Hulu…eventually will this effect TV networks? “Traditional television assumes your time is scarce and it has you for a few precious hours before bed. The streaming services assume they own your free time, whenever it comes – travel, holidays, weekends – to fill with five- and 10-hour entertainments.” (Poniewozik, 2016)
Success of streaming TV shows have open up doors for writers that haven’t been noticed for networks or regular TV.  Streaming companies can afford to take risk unlike major networks and more creative people can shine this way. The Orange is the New Black is a Netflix original and has won several awards already the only downfall I see with this is what if a person can’t afford to pay for streaming TV.
I must admit I love no commercials and the big networks have taken notice and decided to cut there commercial time in order to compete with streaming TV services “it seems as though
the big networks have decided that the best way to
compete with a commercial-free service is to lessen the amount of the commercials shown and charge more for them.” (Gonezales, 2015) 

Well I participate in both the streaming world and regular TV I need both to survive!














References



           Warner, K. J. (2015). They Gon' Think You Loud Regardless: Ratchetness, Reality Television, and Black Womanhood. Camera Obscura, 30(88), 129-153. doi:10.1215/02705346-2885475


        Gomez, P. (2015). SCANDAL CREATOR SHONDA RHIMES My Year of Yes. People, 84(20), 73-76.

    Lansky, S., Trianni, F., & Berman, E. (2015). Shonda Rhimes on Raising the Next Generation of TV Producers. Time.Com, N.PAG.



GONZALES, D. (2015). Thanks to Netflix, TV Will Have Fewer Commercials. PC Magazine, 15-17.


http://gu.com/p/4fkbm/sbl

Sunday, December 6, 2015

Chiraq vs ChiTown

  Chi-Raq, a Spike Lee production was released in movie theaters worldwide Friday December 4, 2015. We all love or love to hate Spike Lee because of his controversial productions but this film Chi-Raq hit a nerve not only to myself but thousands of Chicagoans. Rappers, Actors and politicians all had a rebuttal to this film.


Chi-Raq is advertised as a true story but many feel this movie is a misrepresentation of Chicago's Englewood community but as usual Lee stands by his films one hundred percent including the fact there are Chicago natives playing roles in the movie. The title alone allude that Chicago is a war zone the Mayor of Chicago among others was hoping the title would change. 

 None is negating there have been over 100 murders this year but if you want to shed light on a community in crisis why not help these communities instead of shining light on the flaws. Open up a school for the performance arts, bring business that can lead to employment, community centers not making a movie about Englewood and having your audience think the entire city of Chicago is this way. Several movies, books, plays, articles famous people feeling sorry for Chicago but no one cares enough for real to help.  Chicago is not the only city who suffers from senseless murders and according to the movie I'm scared to leave out of my house and hear gunshots daily. I'm not impressed. It's my fear that the youth now in Englewood maybe a product of this movie. They may think street gangs and murder is the norm, they won't try to escape they will try to imitate the roles in this movie. This movie raise some valuable points but not everyone or everything that comes from Chicago is bad, the title alone will make someone mind up if they will come here to visit. So Spike Lee wants Chicagoans to wake up but I challenge him to come help us wake up.